Sorry for coming back on this topic 3 years after, but kimc was right. Strange that nobody continued the discussion.
I fully agree on debunking, doing the same on many similar fake “proofs”, but here, your explanation is wrong. I had the curiosity to measure the sizes; MOST of the ratios between APXS and the Mars picture don’t match and this is not within “sand-print” errors, if far larger, like 2/1. I said most cause the only one acceptable would be the screw head/screw cut ... Read even more