The format of the article linked gives away a lot away: After the introductory exposition, he leads with his conclusion, and then provides a list of arbitrary facts with no attempt to connect any of it back to his conclusion. There’s a reason that standard argument format goes claim>procedure>data>conclusion, the intention is to put all cards down as they’re drawn. “This is what I think,” “This is what I will do, and how it will support my claim ... Read even more
