No doubt every sensible person accepts this in general. But many an even sensible person makes exceptions when a hypothesis they are, for some reason, personally attached to largely hinges on eyewitness testimony. They are suddenly far more fired up to highlight the improbability of trained pilots making error judgments. At least not with UFOs.
The follow-up question, of course, is whether or not there are good grounds to question their accuracy, or whether such questioning is solely borne of a close-minded need to debunk any and all reference to aliens.
This is true if:
(1) These ‘solid data points’ (i.e. physical records) are deemed ... Read even more
