I’m curious to know where members of this forum get their understanding of (the “official” version of) the WTC collapses from. Most major (engineering as well as aviation) disasters have an often substantial “popular science” literature. Even where conspiracy theories exist, there are usually several longform articles and books that ignore them altogether (or relegate them to a footnote) and just lay out the (often very interesting) story of how investigators solved the puzzle of how it happened. There’s also usually a good documentary film or two.
(The narrative is usually: here’s what puzzled scientists at first and here’s how they finally solved it. Sometimes there’s a subplot of scientists competing to be first with a solution.)
Since around 2005 ... Read even more
